社交机器人正逐渐渗透至人们的日常生活各个领域,使得人类与这些智能实体的互动变得越来越普遍和频繁。为了深入理解并剖析人与社交机器人之间的复杂交互机制,我们借鉴了心理学中的凯利归因理论作为分析框架。这一理论的核心思想在于,个体如何解释他人或他物的行为,往往基于他们将行为原因归因于何种因素——内部(如性格、意愿)或外部(如环境压力、外部控制)。在此基础上,我们划分并探讨了人们将机器人行为责任归因于机器人的多种具体情境。通过运用归因理论进行逻辑推导和演绎,我们发现:当机器人的反馈被视作自主决策的结果时,相较于被视为仅仅根据预设程序执行的反馈,前者在自主性、责任感以及能力方面获得了人类更高的评价。这表明,机器人的自主性水平与其社交表现及人类与之互动的评价之间存在正相关关系。也就是说,如果机器人被赋予更多的自主决策权,人们往往对其社交能力给予更高的认可,同时与这样的机器人互动也会带来更加积极正面的体验。这一发现不仅加深了我们对人机互动本质的理解,也为未来社交机器人的设计和开发提供了有价值的参考方向。Social robots are increasingly penetrating various aspects of people’s daily lives, making interactions between humans and these intelligent entities more common and frequent. To gain a deeper understanding and dissect the complex interaction mechanisms between humans and social robots, we have adopted Kelly’s Attribution Theory from psychology as an analytical framework. The core idea of this theory lies in how individuals interpret the behaviors of others or objects, often based on whether they attribute the causes of these behaviors to internal factors (such as personality, intentions) or external factors (such as environmental pressures, external controls). Building on this, we have categorized and explored various s
